Thanks Doctor Said (Sa-id)

Its amazing how people can just promise one thing and do another. Today i had a test worth 20% which i personally think i'm going to fail.

Its not that i didn't study for it, well i did last minute study but then again which student can honestly say he / she has never studied last minute? Well the fact of the matter lies on the things he said and the sample paper he set. Whats interesting is that:

1) The way he questioned the sample paper was appplication.
- the way he set it was based all on defination

2) Its been most lecturer's traditional and his especially to set the questions on the paper similar to the sample paper. This makes total sense because the sample paper is made to reflect how the exam would be, how difficult it would be and what the lecturer wants out of you.
- look at (1)

3) In the lecture before the exam, he clearly said afew times that he will be setting the paper similarly to the sample paper. It would be based on application not on defination.

4) In lectures he claimed some parts would be a "you only need to know", not going to be tested. Well this stuff did come out.

Its a wonder why adults are looking at youth and asking how did they turn so angry and rebellious? Now i do hold the right to be angry but to be honest the dumb lecturer has his right to set the paper in anyway he wants. No matter what style or what he said. But i just to acknowledge the injustice done here today, its not something to shout about but definately something to remember.